Measuring Direct Contract ROI After Year One

The first year of a direct contract is messy.

Implementation issues, learning curves, partial steerage.

By the time you hit your first renewal discussion, you will have:

• A pile of anecdotes
• Some claims data
• Strong opinions from providers, members, and internal stakeholders

Turning that into a clean ROI story is where many programs stumble.

Start with a simple counterfactual

The core question is not “Did we save money?” in the abstract.

It is:

“Compared to a realistic alternative, are we better off with this contract?”

A practical counterfactual is:

• What would we have spent on the same cases under prior contracting and steerage patterns, adjusted for trend?

This gives you a baseline that your CFO can recognize.

Define the cohort

Be precise about which cases you’re evaluating:

• Service lines and procedure codes
• Member eligibility (plans, regions)
• Time window (e.g., plan year)

Then split into:

• In-program cases (went through the direct contract pathway)
• Out-of-program cases (eligible but stayed in the legacy path)

This lets you compare both within and outside the program.

Measure three layers of impact

1. Unit cost impact

   • Average allowed amount per case in-program vs. baseline.
   • Adjust for obvious mix differences when you can.

2. Steerage impact

   • How many eligible cases actually used the program.
   • What percentage of total relevant spend that represents.

3. Total financial impact

   • (Baseline unit cost − actual unit cost) × number of in-program cases.
   • Minus incremental program costs (fees, incentives, travel, internal project work if material).

This yields a dollar number and a percentage of baseline spend.

Don’t ignore partial success

It is unlikely that year one will hit your “perfect world” scenario.

You might see:

• Excellent unit cost improvement
• Modest steerage
• Net savings that are meaningful but not transformative

Tell that story honestly:

“On the cases that went through the program, we reduced average allowed amounts by 22%. With 37% steerage, that yielded $X in net savings after costs. The opportunity is to increase steerage and expand scope.”

This gives you a concrete “scale or stop” decision instead of a vague feeling.

Capture non-financial outcomes—but don’t lead with them

Executives will ask about:

• Member satisfaction
• Access and quality metrics
• Operational friction

Track them.

Use them to:

• Explain why you might keep or kill a contract that is marginal on pure dollars.
• Decide whether to expand to adjacent service lines.

Just don’t pretend that a financially negative program is a win because some survey scores look nice.

Prepare for skepticism

Expect reasonable pushback:

• “How confident are we in the baseline?”
• “What about trend and case mix?”
• “Are we just shifting spend around?”

Have answers, even if they are approximate:

• Sensitivity analyses showing results under different baseline assumptions.
• Simple mix controls (e.g., by DRG or CPT clusters).
• Clarity on what is not included in the analysis.

CFOs do not need perfection.

They need to believe you are being more honest and disciplined than the average vendor ROI slide.

---

Year one is not about proving that direct contracting can solve all of your healthcare cost problems.

It is about proving that, for a defined slice of spend, a different contract and steerage structure can beat the status quo in a way you can measure.

If you can tell that story clearly, you will earn the right to run years two and three.